The more I think about it, the more I like the idea of travelling in the UK, compared with the hassle of taking a holiday abroad. I spent most of this week on the Yorkshire coast, and it was hassle free. It cost me £25 per night in a decent B&B, with breakfast and free internet, and £21 return train fare.

Hassle free British holiday
The beach in Scarborough was fantastic, and you did not have to fight over sun loungers. Not once did I have queue to check-in my luggage or spend time in airport security. I didn’t have to wait 2 hours before my flight and then find that the luggage was sent to Timbuktu by mistake.
Unreliable British weather
For me the biggest downside of spending your holiday in Britain is the unreliable weather. That said we had a five minute rain shower in all of the time we were away. The hassle of cancelled trip to Paris and stranded in The Hague have made me realise I need to spend more time discovering Britain.
Fly with an airline that treats you like a human
I love exploring new places, but I do think that the hassle of low cost flights has put me off travelling unless I can afford to pay to fly with airlines that treat passengers like humans, not cattle. Do you think that travel has become too stressful, or, do you cope with what is thrown at you?
As usual, I welcome your opinions.
Please enter your email address to receive my free newsletter
Nick | 21 August, 2010 at 1:05 pm
Darren
The British Isles has a lot to offer, I have taken 1 British Holiday every year for 20 plus years and there still places I have not seen. It is not that expensive, in fact can be great value.. I recently handled an enquiry for a 2011 may break and the price (in a caravan) worked out to be 2.44 per person per night for a family of 4. Even normally as a family you can enjoy a break at around the £100 for the weekend for all of you.
My view is that because UK holidays tend to be advertised as say £300 per week, people look at the price and go I can go to Majorca for £299 and forget the 300 is for 4 and the 299 is each so £1196 for 4. Compared to the closer city’s you mentioned there no real difference in the weather and no worries about loosing your passport or changing money (except Eire).
So go on enjoy what is Great in Britain.
Dave | 23 August, 2010 at 3:51 am
It funny but I feel the same way. If I can’t afford to fly on a real airline, I don’t want to go. There is no reason to try to go on a relaxing vacation and take a fling bus where you are treated like cattle.
Sally Broom | 23 August, 2010 at 9:31 am
Great blog
Yes, I do believe travelling short-haul by air is now the most stressful element of a trip and devoid from any real travel enjoyment.
Having just returned from Cornwall and recently enjoyed a sail-rail trip to Ireland, plus several jaunts around the UK in between, it’s going to take quite a lot to encourage me to take a flight any time soon.
That said, for first class ‘shorthaul’ service my suggestion is to take the train. Earlier this year we visited eastern Germany by train and couldn’t fault the service and support one bit.
So yes, short haul flying for me is an increasing turn off, but for added excitement and exploration value, the train is the way to go
James | 24 August, 2010 at 9:41 am
One of the reasons foreign holidays got so popular was the value for money or perceived value for money one could get. Since the removal of duty free in EU, the pound getting devalued and costs (hidden extras!) going up I don’t think people have the percpetion that going away is “cheaper than staying at home” – a phrase I used to hear when I worked in a travel agency.
The current economic conditions present a golden opportunity for domestic tourism (as well as for raising our game and attracting more inbound visitors).
Victoria Trott | 26 August, 2010 at 11:17 am
Britain has so much to offer but the weather is the problem.
I don’t fly – too much hassle. When I’m travelling in Europe I take the train.
Shalina | 26 August, 2010 at 11:29 am
Hi Darren
British holidays in many ways have been tarred with images of ‘Carry on Camping’ and the like. Granted, the weather is a big negating factor when it comes to home-based holidays, whilst I can vouch for British holidays personally through working in British tourism and having taken many British holidays, I can also confirm a very healthy market for British Tourism.
We started our website after the recession started, late 2008 with the expectation that more British people would look for holidays in the UK (combined with rising flight costs). We’ve seen an exponential rise in traffic as more and more are looking for deals for uk holidays. Holiday Parks remain as popular as ever in chalet, caravan and lodge apartments as do hotel breaks with families for example. I think if anything, the global problems have forced the UK holiday market to increase their quality (have you been to a Butlins recently?) whilst making their prices more competitive and I believe the UK holiday market is now seeing earlier investment pay off.
Also as a mother of 2 I know how stressful it is taking the kids on car journeys and on aeroplanes but I know which I prefer! There is a lot to be said about ‘branding’ where you might have the sunny coast of Spain at £299 per person for a week, Vs a beach holiday park in England for lets say £199 per person for a week. The images conjure up something quite different however there are many pros of staying local.
Darren Cronian | 28 August, 2010 at 1:27 am
Thanks for the comments everyone
@ Victoria – interestingly a lot of people that I speak to say that train is the best way to get around Europe. I travelled between Amsterdam and Den Haag in May, and it was a great service, so, if the rest of Europe is the same, I think I will do the same.
@ Shalina – you are probably right that the image of British holidays is still in the 1970s carry on camping style. It seems at towns like Scarborough that finally some money is been put into making it more attractive for tourists.
Andrew | 28 August, 2010 at 11:16 am
I took my holiday this year in Scotland. The forecasts weren’t good but by checking the rainfall radar I was able to be in the right place at the right time to avoid the rain.
Britain has great history, wide spaces, great restaurants, what more could you want?
Darren Cronian | 28 August, 2010 at 11:18 am
@ Andrew
Hi! Thanks for the comment. This year I went to Northumberland and Yorkshire for my hols, and loved it. There were a few rain storms but thankfully, they didn’t last for too long. There’s so many places in Britain left undiscovered for me. I’d love to up to the Shetlands, and see more of Scotland, then down to Cornwall.
Patrick goff | 28 August, 2010 at 11:28 am
I love UK. Weather tis problematic but biggest problem I have is poor quality of the hotels. I know I am a hotel critic but so many are poorly designed, have lousy service, are not clean, have unsmiling staff etc. etc..
I have just visited 11 hotels in 7 countries in Europe (driving) which have ranged from poor to terrific. In all staff were markedly more smiley than in the UK.
If I have the money though i’d go to Namibia, South Africa , Botswana, Tansania every time for the space, friendliness, interesting food, wildlife and teh feeling that my tourist money is helping people out of poverty.
The UK? Could do a whole lot better. Oh- and short haul air – i’d rather drive or take the train, don’t like being treated worse than an animal
Pingback - Waxing UnLyrical | 29 August, 2010 at 12:01 pm
[...] British holidays are not that bad, from Darren Cronian‘s Travel [...]
Sophie | 31 August, 2010 at 8:20 am
I love holidays in the UK, we’ve had two this summer. Sadly, to get there, I have to fly (otherwise it takes 2 days, 2 trains and 2 ferries)
12 responses to “British holidays are not that bad”