By Darren Cronian on Saturday, November 1st, 2008

Millions of British travellers have taken advantage of hassle free travel to the United States thanks to the visa waiver program, but that is all to end when the Electronic System for Travel Authorisation [ESTA] comes into force.

United States puts up new hurdles for British travellers

From the 12 January 2009, you will need to apply online, at least three days ahead, and provide information ranging from personal details to travel plans. Only if you are judged as suitable will you will be allowed entrance to the United States.

Passengers who fail to clear the new hurdle will be referred to the US embassy or advised to apply for another visa, which could take weeks or months to process. Today I had a look online for advice and found a few third party websites that seem to be charging £25 for a PDF guide of the new procedures, that I find outrageous.

As I find more information I will add it to this post but in the meantime please find links below to free information for travellers.

» Department for Homeland security
» ESTA online application
» ESTA web help

If you have any questions or guidance please leave a comment.


Related posts

Please enter your email address to receive my free newsletter

 



18 responses to “United States puts up new hurdles for British travellers”

Gary | 1 November, 2008 at 5:37 am

We still fear an attempt by the British to install George III as king.

Report this comment

Andy Hayes | 1 November, 2008 at 9:49 am

Yes, many continentals can travel to the US now as well without visas, but they must have biometric passports. Not sure if the Brits need them as well but honestly… must they make everything so difficult?

Report this comment

Jacinta Lodge | 1 November, 2008 at 10:23 am

I clicked through to a link – did they really just say “we’re going to scan your computer now and bugger to your rights”?

Anyway, I know that Australia has a similar system (at least for visiting Germans and numerous other countries) but that really just consists of your flight, your name, your passport number. Plus it’s an easy online registration (or your travel agent does it automatically) and they don’t try and invade your computer (or at least they don’t announce it).

I’ve been to the States four times since Sept 11 and every time I’ve been singled out for the extra special pat down. Right now I’m in the frame of mind of ‘ you know there are so many other really interesting places in the world that if you want to treat me suspiciously then I don’t really have to put myself through it. I got other places to go.’

Report this comment

Nick | 1 November, 2008 at 12:32 pm

Darren

Travel Agents are getting trained to deal with this system. However the information is down to the traveler to check. America is not the only country doing this and soon will be very common.

This system also has an advantage, it basically checks against a list of people that would have been rejected on entry anyway. (So instead of arriving and being placed on a plane to return, you know in advance.) Very few people will get rejected in %. It is a lot better than getting a visa.

Also note for those travelling to the UK we are bringing in a similar system as is the EU. (Details already need to be provided by British passport holders to travel to Spain).

Australia also already has an electronic validation system.

Report this comment

Jack | 1 November, 2008 at 2:10 pm

How come the US spends millions and millions on getting tourists to go there, and then make it difficult to enter through immigrations? This ‘theater of security’ is really quite counter-productive so far.

Report this comment

Darren Cronian | 1 November, 2008 at 4:32 pm

Thanks for the comments everyone.

@ Nick

Have you heard of any problems using this system in other countries?

@ Lee

Good tip!!

@ Andrew

Thank you for posting about your experiences – I am glad it was painless. Good point about the people taking advantage. I have seen a few sites offer guides for all sorts of prices and they charge to this for you. It’s a con.

Report this comment

Andrew | 1 November, 2008 at 4:01 pm

I’ve just done my ESTA (and my wife’s) on line at the US embassy web site. Free. It took 5 minutes and they only ask the same questions that are on the I94(w) – the green form – no new questions – nothing intrusive.

There’s the usual rip off artists charging for the job – but they don’t do anything that you can’t do on the official web site.

The ESTA can be printed out, and it’s good for 2 years.

Currently we see massive lines at US immigration – so if the ESTA system speeds up the process, then that can’t be at all bad. And if eventually it stops the need to fill out the I94(w) then that makes it easier for us all.

If you haven’t got a computer, then maybe there’s a problem – maybe travel agents will help – but then again, if you haven’t got a computer, you can’t be discussing it here!!!!

Report this comment

Lee Harrison | 1 November, 2008 at 4:15 pm

@ Andrew. Just remember not to keep your ESTA in your Wallet :-)

Report this comment

Dean | 1 November, 2008 at 10:28 pm

Hi Darren

I recently added some advice on this on my blog. I am registered with the Visit USA association who help with advice to travel agents, and the information is courtesy of them.

The task is not onerous, and as Andrew states the information is the same as the current green I94 form. But people should be reminded that this is not a visa to enter the US, and as such does not guarantee entry. And advice is free, no way should anyone be paying for this information.

Report this comment

Darren Cronian | 3 November, 2008 at 2:15 am

@ Dean

Do you not think that Visit USA (or the government) should be doing something about these companies that are selling their services, by charging consumers for advice on the new system, or completing the online form for them?

Report this comment

Nick | 3 November, 2008 at 1:23 pm

Darren

Only problem we had was Australia where a customer had same name, month and year of birth as someone on the watch list. But the Australian High Commission sorted this out very quickly.

The only other problems I know about personally is people using the British system (for entry into the UK) which can be a pain if your born in one country but national of another or hold dual nationality.

Report this comment

Nick | 4 November, 2008 at 11:08 am

Darren

The thing about these pre-clearance systems is they tell you in advance if you’re allowed in the country (rather than the 1000′s of people that used to be refused entry when they arrived because they did not qualify). They also generally only ask the same questions that you filled in on paper forms anyway. So in this modern age when we talking about switching from paper to computer this again wins. So maybe the title should be United States makes it easier for travelers?

In fact, I find it hard to see the bad points of these systems compared to the paper systems, can you?

For reference only Australia ETA’s come with a fee, all others should be free.
(Jargon buster ETA = Electronic Travel Authority)

Report this comment

Darren Cronian | 4 November, 2008 at 1:56 pm

@ Nick

I think its a good idea to be honest, anything that speeds up the process and takes away manual systems is good in my eyes. My headline was really to get people interested in the blog post and discussing the issue.

Report this comment

Simon | 4 November, 2008 at 6:02 pm

Does this basically mean that you should check before booking a holiday to the US? I would imagine this will create a downturn in online bookings, and possibly an increase in people going to retail agents?

Report this comment

Darren Cronian | 4 November, 2008 at 6:29 pm

@ Simon

I don’t think it’ll make any difference to bookings, other than you might find some people who do not have the internet and will want the travel agent to do this for them online. I suspect the agent would not want to do that.

Good questions. Anyone have any answers?

Report this comment

Jay Houston | 28 February, 2009 at 8:14 am

Travellers should always remember that possession of a visa is NO guarantee of entry as most immigration officials have the discretionary authority to override a visa.

Report this comment

anjeeta | 5 March, 2009 at 8:13 pm

Darren, I can’t help but agree with Nick. I am a US green card holder who requires a visa to visit the UK. This used to be a straightforward simple process which has now been changed to include biometrics etc as a result the process has been outsourced to an agency. To cut a long story short, I need to come to the UK quite often as my elderly ma in law lives in London. I try and keep my visa current as I often have to fly in on a short notice. I recently applied to renew my long term visa which now is a pricey $340.Well I recently received my passport with only a six month entry! I was shocked to say the least as an ordinary six month only costs $100 and here I had paid $340! Needless to say you cant question the decision and there is no chance of a refund. I am so gutted and upset but have no choice but to abide by the decision. In a soft economy like this the price of my trip to London just went up exponentially. Most people have no clue of how difficult it is to travel when you need to have a visa for everywhere.

Report this comment

liz haddow | 23 February, 2010 at 8:04 am

i have 5years on my old style passport left to run and i have been told that i can only get into the usa if i have a chip in my passport

Report this comment