By Darren Cronian on Sunday, June 15th, 2008

I’ve never needed to use a tourist information office; I’ve picked up leaflets for local attractions at the hotel, searched and booked hotels and B&B’s on the internet, so it amazes me that the tourist office has survived for so long.

No future for the tourist information office

Reason’s why I think that there’s no future for the tourist information office:

The effect on the environment

All those glossy brochures, leaflets printed on unrecycled paper aren’t very good for the environment. If the tourism industry is serious about dealing with global warming then it needs to think more about making tourist information offices more environmentally friendly.

Future of mobile technology

I suspect the most popular questions are relating to directions to local attractions, parking spaces etc, so with the emergence of GPS, on mobile phones and in cars, I can see this eventually ending the life of the tourist information office.

Online experience

In my opinion this is where I can see the high street tourist information office heading, and according to Visit Scotland, they receive over 18 million hits on it’s website each year. More of us are using the internet to research and organise our weekend tips and holidays.

Search engines do it better

Yahoo, MSN and Google all offer mapping technology which allows you to find directions to your hotel, tourist attractions and restaurants. Search for user generated content on travel forums and blogs, and read reviews of restaurants, hotels and attractions.

I’d be interested to hear your thoughts on tourist information offices.


Related posts


Not found what you came here for? Ask your travel questions and receive a personal response.

Bookmark and Share

I hope you enjoyed this blog post. If you did, receive blog posts like this delivered to your RSS reader or email inbox. Click to sign up for free updates.

23 responses to “No future for the tourist information office”

Amanda Kendle | 15 June, 2008 at 4:04 pm

Your theory sounds right, but the funny thing is that I have sometimes used tourist information offices. For example, in Estonia, the staff there were so friendly and helpful (I started off in Narva in the east where I was welcomed as practically the first Australian tourist to ever visit) that I kept popping in to them whichever town I visited – they gave such nice, personalised advice. And to be honest I rather like to browse the walls full of brochures (a whole lot more than are just at the hotel, and somehow easier to “see” than online). All this makes me sound a bit old-fashioned but I’m normally a total net addict … so my opinion is split.

Report this comment

Darren Cronian | 15 June, 2008 at 9:41 pm

I actually remembered after writing that I had infact been to a tourist information office, it’s just at the time I didn’t see it as that because I went there to buy a 3 day public transport ticket.

Report this comment

Rohan | 16 June, 2008 at 12:13 am

Darren I think you are forgetting that in some destinations, the tourist information office, is the centre of the community.

We have used a lot of tourist offices on our travels to help us with the public transport, and directions.

Yes, you can do that on the internet, but you have to print things out (not environmentally friendly) instead of going to the tourist office and getting the advice from someone who spends a lot of time there.

Report this comment

Charles | 16 June, 2008 at 12:26 am

To add I think you need to visit a tourist information office because they have had to radically changed and sell tourist gifts, sell tickets and have expanded to what you think a tourist office used to be.

Report this comment

Nathan | 16 June, 2008 at 12:04 pm

Interesting theory Darren. I think the intersection of web services and mobile devices is where they’ll end up – for example the audio tours many tourist offices offer will be offered as downloads for phones or mp3 players. That would deal with Rohan’s reservations about paper too.

TOs will remain a touchpoint for travellers – may even become more of one – online. But to be fair this won’t happen until we get widespread, reliable internet access and GPS on mobile devices. The technology is there but it doesn’t have sufficient penetration yet.

Report this comment

Darren Cronian | 16 June, 2008 at 12:35 pm

@ Nathan

Good points, and I agree that mobile technology/GPS isn’t quite there yet, but its becoming closer with phones like the Nokia N95 and the new iPhone.

I mentioned some of the downsides of mobile technology on a post this week. I’d be interested in your thoughts.

Report this comment

Corie | 16 June, 2008 at 2:08 pm

Why even bother going away at all….just do a virtual trip.
Go to tourist offices, talk with real people, help them stay employed, let them help find a little out of the way inn, a favorite restaurant, an insider’s un-spell-checked view of their community.

Report this comment

Nathan | 16 June, 2008 at 3:30 pm

It’s nothing to do with real vs virtual people or trips. That’s far too general a reading. We are talking specifically about the most effective way to deliver a tourist information service. One that is distributed across a city through web/mobile devices is demonstrably more useful and more accessible than one whose resources are concentrated in one location.

The content is still going to be created by real people (real insiders, most likely), and you’ll still be coming into contact with locals.

Report this comment

Darren Cronian | 16 June, 2008 at 6:04 pm

@ Corie

Thanks for commenting. Virtual people sounds something out of the 70s. I know it will mean people loosing jobs, and that’s not nice at all, but times are changing.

Report this comment

pam | 16 June, 2008 at 6:34 pm

I love the tourist information office. When I arrive by train to some unknown city, need a map, can’t decide on a hotel, just want to find out some obscure fact, see what’s on… even in places I’ve traveled frequently, like Vienna, the tourist information is a required stop – to get transit tickets, to pick up a new subway map, to get the arts calendar. I would be sad if they were replaced by machines and this wired, seasoned traveler thinks they’re invaluable.

Report this comment

Darren Cronian | 16 June, 2008 at 7:41 pm

@ Pam

This is why I love blogs. I love how readers can put their points forward, and good points they are too.

I think my problem is I am TOO organised when it comes to booking trips, so I’ve not the need for tourist information.

Report this comment

Maggie Foster | 16 June, 2008 at 7:48 pm

Believe me I have read some travel sites in my time but I have not seen anyone reply to every single comment as you do. Well done.

I cannot believe though that you think tourist information offices should close. I agree with Rohan, in lesser known destinations it is vital that these offices are kept open.

It isn’t just tourists that find these offices a godsend but locals too.

Report this comment

Darren Cronian | 16 June, 2008 at 7:53 pm

@ Maggie

Ta for the nice comments :) I think it is important that bloggers reply to all comments, so that readers feel part of a community.

Okay, maybe my post was aimed more at big city tourist information offices. I can understand your points on smaller destinations.

I noticed you have the Sri Lanka tourist website on your link, do you work for them?

Report this comment

Nomadic Matt | 16 June, 2008 at 8:52 pm

I tend to go into them when I get into a place to snoop around but with the advent of mobile internet, everything i need to know is at the push of a button.

Report this comment

Darren Cronian | 16 June, 2008 at 9:32 pm

@ Matt

Would appreciate your thoughts on my reasons why I think mobile won’t take off yet. The post is here

Report this comment

Nomadic Matt | 17 June, 2008 at 12:32 pm

@darren:

done.

and how abouy your thoughts on my recent post? :)

Report this comment

Darren Cronian | 17 June, 2008 at 1:48 pm

@ Matt

I love your new design, looks great. I will pop by tonight and leave a few comments. I usually spend one night a week networking and leaving comments on travel blogs.

Report this comment

Vicky | 17 June, 2008 at 3:23 pm

Hi Darren, I think there will always be a segment of travellers who value local, face to face information as more authentic and trustworthy, just as others of us flock to blogs and user generated content.

Stephen and I were running focus groups with regular travellers a few weeks back and while they all agreed that the internet was now completely indispensible to their travel planning process, for some this was tinged with regret at the way personal contact has been squeezed out.

For some the personal aspect (from the visit to the travel agent, to talking local knowledge with tourism information staff) is a part of the travel experience and it would be a shame to use technology to shoehorn people in to the same solutions when their preferences differ.

Mind you – last time I asked for tourist information “I have half a day and no car, what can you recommend I do”, the answer I got was sit by the pool and get drunk. OK!

Report this comment

Darren Cronian | 17 June, 2008 at 5:36 pm

@ Vicky

Good points made.

I walked past Leeds tourist information office this morning and had to have a laugh to myself. They were three people sat at desks and no one stood at the desks asking for advice, they looked bored to be honest. They were I reckon, at a quick count, another 9 people in the building, and these people were mingling in the tourist gift shop part of the building.

Buying gifts is not exactly getting tourist information advice.

I take your points though about the human element, I agree, but I think that tourist information offices are in the stone age (not quite but you know what I mean) and they provide a more 21st century approach to tourist information.

The advantage of the internet for me is that I don’t have the time to be spending it searching the high street for a tourist office, when I can get it online.

Report this comment

John Shipley | 19 June, 2008 at 12:01 am

I cannot remember the last time I used a tourist information office. LIke a few of you have mentioned I use the internet.

If I am booking my holiday I always use a travel agent for the human contact.

Report this comment

Esther Smith | 19 June, 2008 at 8:23 am

I agree that there is no longer a need for tourist offices to have high street offices as the need for drop in visitors have declined over the years. The need for lots of glossy brochures have been replaces by the internet. However, there will always be someone who will need the above services and one must be able to provide this service if and when needed.
Tourist offices can now spend more time marketing and promoting their destinations and having a voice through Associations such as ANTOR and other industry bodies.
But the tourist office will always need to exist to liaise with the trade and therefore will need representation so that travel agencies, tour operators and airlines are updated on destinations around the world. The trade in return will then have to ability to continue (as one person earlier mentioned) give destination information to the consumers.

Report this comment

Darren Cronian | 19 June, 2008 at 9:08 am

@ Esther

Thanks for popping by and taking up my invitation to comment from ANTOR’s perspective, its always good to get a balanced view.

Report this comment

MB | 19 August, 2008 at 7:37 pm

I’ve used the tourist information office at the start of spur-of-the-moment day trips to small towns. It’s not always practical to have a guidebook for every place I might visit or even Internet access. I also needed Tourist office desperately when my plans changed suddenly during a recent trip and I needed quick help finding a hotel.

While I generally prefer to book my travel online in advance, you can’t beat the tourist information office for quick, personal information from someone with in-depth local knowledge of a place.

Report this comment

Please post a comment

     Comments will be moderated. Please read the comment policy before posting.