By Darren Cronian on Monday, October 22nd, 2007

Surely it’s time we have an European standard hotel rating/classified system because as I understand each country within the EEC has a different criteria to rank or a hotel, and what might be a 3 star in Greece, is a 2 star in the UK.

Time to Standardise Hotel classifications

Then to complicate the issue in the UK I have seen hotels ranked by stars and diamonds. I’ve stayed in a 2 star apartment in Kos which was much nicer than the 3 star apartment in Crete, which I will write about more later.

I’ve also stayed in a 3 star hotel in London, which in my opinion should have been lucky to get any classification. Basically, there doesn’t appear to be any consistancy, which makes it more challenging choosing a hotel at home or abroad.

In my simple head .. [no comments please] why can’t we have a system which gives a score to each basic feature/service the hotel has.

For example; Hotel A has room service, so gets 9 points, and Hotel B, has no room service so gets 3 points. Total up these points for each basic feature/service, and if Hotel A gets over 110 points it’s a 3 star hotel, if Hotel B gets over 75 points but less than 110 its a 2 star hotel.

Am I being unrealistic or do I not understand how hotels are currently classified/rated?


Related posts


Not found what you came here for? Ask your travel questions and receive a personal response.

Sign up to my free Travel Rants newsletter

 

Bookmark and Share

I hope you enjoyed this blog post. If you did, receive blog posts like this delivered to your RSS reader or email inbox. Click to sign up for free updates.

12 responses to “Time to Standardise Hotel classifications”

Kevin May | 22 October, 2007 at 5:05 pm

one could argue that you’re being unrealistic.

in fact, in the modern world of user generated content, the hotel star classification scheme will become redundant as it will be consumers that rate hotels and accommodation online, giving a truer picture of what a hotel is like.

perhaps.

Report comment

Payam Minoofar | 22 October, 2007 at 7:53 pm

Yahsu,

I completely agree with you. However, in my experience, the validity of the rating depends on the dependability of the source and the city that you happen to be visiting.

In my experience, the ratings at http://www.hotelpronto.com, http://www.expedia.com, http://www.hotwire.com and http://www.hotels.com have been quite reasonable. The addition of user ratings at expedia and hotels.com is espeically useful.

That said, I have learned that these ratings tend to be far less reliable in major destination cities. When I booked a 4-star hotel in San Sebastian, Spain, through hotelpronto.com, I really got a fantastic 4-star hotel. When I booked a 3-star hotel in Paris through expedia.com, I got what I thought was barely a 2-star hotel. Same thing with the hotel I booked in Brussels through Expedia. When I used the service to get a 3-star Hotel in Duesseldorf, I got a nearly 4-star hotel.

Now, in these two cases, the locations were phenomenal. In Paris, I was next to the opera house, and in Brussels, I was literally on Grand Place (or Grote Markt, if you prefer Flemish/Dutch). So, I don’t know if location factors into these things or not. My location in Duesseldorf was good.

In general, however, ratings were far more consistent in Germany, Spain, and Netherlands. The UK is earning a reputation for inconsistency in everything these days. And, it might be a British phenomenon that you are experiencing, rather than a travel industry phenomenon.

Payam

Report comment

Guillaume | 23 October, 2007 at 7:28 am

Hi Darren,

You are not the only one lost in all of those different star rating classifications. The hotel and tourism industries have been talking about this issue for years and haven’t much progressed since then. In France, the star rating is something very much regulated by the French Tourism Board and adopts a similar system like you mention. For example, if your hotel doesn’t have 24hours room service, you can’t be a 4 star hotel…Another question raised on Hotel Blogs is how can I qualify to call my property a Hotel ? What is the minimum of rooms to be called a Hotel? A work in progress…

Report comment

Darren Cronian | 23 October, 2007 at 9:22 am

Kev, good point about user generated content, but then aren’t we forgetting the “traditional” holidaymaker who isn’t internet saavy, and has no interest of using the internet to book their holiday?

Payam, where do these sites get their ratings from though? They can’t have possibly visited the hotels from themselves, so must be getting them from the tourism board or some source.

Guillaume, I’m glad that this has been raised, but it seems that we are within a European Union yet we have different classifications for each country, and in Greece’s case, each Greek Island.

Interesting about the French system, do you think this works? I reckon it would be an administrative nightmare for the appropriate tourist boards, but there needs to be some consistancy about how hotels are classified.

Report comment

Payam Minoofar | 23 October, 2007 at 6:22 pm

Darren,

Sorry. I have no idea why I addressed my post to Yahtsu. :) A moment of distraction.

If you click on the star rating at hotels.com, you get a popup that explains the ratings. It’s fairly vague, not of much help. I booked a 3-star hotel room at SF Airport recently through hotels.com. I would rate the Travelodge closer to 2-star, but it was a good room.

I booked a 4-star Union Square hotel 5 years ago in SF through hotwire.com (only $80 a night, what I paid for the SFO room two weeks ago!), and it was nearly a 5-star room.

In short, I have no idea. If the French government is regulating the star system, I did not see the effects of that regulation during my last stay in Paris. I suppose the question of whether international sites like Expedia follow French regulations in their ratings is still open. Perhaps the Michelin guides follow French laws, but Expedia Deutschland need not follow them. :)

Perhaps we should start a movement. Everybody should rate their hotels at the booking agency if the booking site accepts user ratings. I use user ratings as the tie-breaker. It’s the best I can do under the circumstances.
:)
Payam

Report comment

Kevin May | 26 October, 2007 at 8:29 am

Darren Cronian | 26 October, 2007 at 4:26 pm

I never knew that some hotels in France were called ‘Palace’ because there’s not a 5 star clasification.

Is it Dubai that has a 7 star hotel?

All very confusing..

Report comment

[...] Time to Standardise Hotel classifications – Sobre la necesidad de crear un standard en la clasificación de hoteles [...]

Report comment

Rob | 30 October, 2007 at 3:06 pm

Just booked a hotel, 4 star in Prague for £31 a night. Not sure what standard of hotels are in Prague.

Has anyone been to Prague?

Report comment

Carol | 31 October, 2007 at 8:07 pm

Are B&Bs the same classifcation as Hotels in France?

We’ve been told our B&B is 3 star, but not sure if this is the same standard as the 3 star hotel we stayed in last year.

Report comment

Darren Cronian | 31 October, 2007 at 8:10 pm

Rob, I stayed in 3 star accommodation, but it was a BOAT hotel!!

The decor was old fashioned, the room’s telephone was from the 60s.

There are newer hotels being built in Prague though that will be modern.

Have you read the reviews on sites like http://www.holidaywatchdog.com and http://www.tripadvisor.co.uk?

Report comment

Payam Minoofar | 31 October, 2007 at 9:22 pm

I stayed at an apartment operated by a bed and breakfast agency in Boston recently. After thinking about the consistency that I have experienced with B&Bs in Mendocino, CA, Toronto, Boston and Barcelona, I think I much prefer staying at B&Bs than at hotels, these days.

This, of course, begs the question: why can’t hotels just be as consistent as B&Bs? After all, some B&Bs offer 5-star service for the price of a 3-star hotel.

Report comment

Please post a comment

     Comments will be moderated. Please read the comment policy before posting.