<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ebookers banned by Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.travel-rants.com/2006/08/10/where-are-thou-ebookers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.travel-rants.com/2006/08/10/where-are-thou-ebookers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 01:52:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ebookers´ Probleme mit Google &#171; elmexercises</title>
		<link>http://www.travel-rants.com/2006/08/10/where-are-thou-ebookers/#comment-9416</link>
		<dc:creator>ebookers´ Probleme mit Google &#171; elmexercises</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.travel-rants.com/2006/08/10/where-are-thou-ebookers/#comment-9416</guid>
		<description>[...] ebookers hatte massive Probleme mit Google - und war zeitweilig aus dem organischen Index der populären Suchmaschine komplett hinausgeflogen. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ebookers hatte massive Probleme mit Google &#8211; und war zeitweilig aus dem organischen Index der populären Suchmaschine komplett hinausgeflogen. [...]
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_9416"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 9416 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_9416"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.travel-rants.com/2006/08/10/where-are-thou-ebookers/#comment-5320</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.travel-rants.com/2006/08/10/where-are-thou-ebookers/#comment-5320</guid>
		<description>The problems continue for ebookers - it appears that the .com version of their domain has also been dropped from Google results aswell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problems continue for ebookers &#8211; it appears that the .com version of their domain has also been dropped from Google results aswell.
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_5320"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 5320 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_5320"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Cronian</title>
		<link>http://www.travel-rants.com/2006/08/10/where-are-thou-ebookers/#comment-4421</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Cronian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 13:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.travel-rants.com/2006/08/10/where-are-thou-ebookers/#comment-4421</guid>
		<description>No problem, but are all three websites, on the same IP address?  

I only noticed the three websites, after posting my initial comments, so edited the comment, but didn&#039;t really explain that if all 3 sites are on the same ip address then this could be the reason for the supplimental pages.

Your right about ebookers though - lessons learnt for everyone I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem, but are all three websites, on the same IP address?  </p>
<p>I only noticed the three websites, after posting my initial comments, so edited the comment, but didn&#8217;t really explain that if all 3 sites are on the same ip address then this could be the reason for the supplimental pages.</p>
<p>Your right about ebookers though &#8211; lessons learnt for everyone I think.
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_4421"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 4421 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_4421"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wolledge</title>
		<link>http://www.travel-rants.com/2006/08/10/where-are-thou-ebookers/#comment-4420</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wolledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 13:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.travel-rants.com/2006/08/10/where-are-thou-ebookers/#comment-4420</guid>
		<description>Hi Darren

Thanks for comments which I appreciate. I don&#039;t think its a dupicate content problem as we went to supplemental index before I linked to these sites which are mine. I only linked to ukcoastguide in an effort to increase links. The countrysideguide is relevant but strategicassets is not relevant - just trying it!! 

No the real problem seems to be lack of good links - we&#039;re working on it but its slow work. But there are many sites with the same thing - mostly supplemental results. Webproword had pages of comments during early summer - many sites are still in SI.  It has been suggested by some that these are unintended results - assocatied with the change to the Big Daddy data centres but onebody really seems to know. I&#039;ll watch this carefully - if ebookers stay in the supplementals it could be devasating for thier business!  

regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Darren</p>
<p>Thanks for comments which I appreciate. I don&#8217;t think its a dupicate content problem as we went to supplemental index before I linked to these sites which are mine. I only linked to ukcoastguide in an effort to increase links. The countrysideguide is relevant but strategicassets is not relevant &#8211; just trying it!! </p>
<p>No the real problem seems to be lack of good links &#8211; we&#8217;re working on it but its slow work. But there are many sites with the same thing &#8211; mostly supplemental results. Webproword had pages of comments during early summer &#8211; many sites are still in SI.  It has been suggested by some that these are unintended results &#8211; assocatied with the change to the Big Daddy data centres but onebody really seems to know. I&#8217;ll watch this carefully &#8211; if ebookers stay in the supplementals it could be devasating for thier business!  </p>
<p>regards
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_4420"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 4420 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_4420"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: portal-012 &#187; Ebookers dumped from Google</title>
		<link>http://www.travel-rants.com/2006/08/10/where-are-thou-ebookers/#comment-4417</link>
		<dc:creator>portal-012 &#187; Ebookers dumped from Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 11:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.travel-rants.com/2006/08/10/where-are-thou-ebookers/#comment-4417</guid>
		<description>[...] Reports this week that ebookers, a subsidiary of Cendant Corporation, is currently having issues with Google. The reports are correct as the site www.ebookers.co.uk has been dropped from Google search results, with only six âsupplementalâ pages in the search engine. Reports this week that ebookers, a subsidiary of Cendant Corporation, is currently having issues with Google. The reports are correct as the site www.ebookers.co.uk has been dropped from Google search results, with only six âsupplementalâ pages in the search engine. Ebookers dumped from Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reports this week that ebookers, a subsidiary of Cendant Corporation, is currently having issues with Google. The reports are correct as the site <a href="http://www.ebookers.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.ebookers.co.uk</a> has been dropped from Google search results, with only six âsupplementalâ pages in the search engine. Reports this week that ebookers, a subsidiary of Cendant Corporation, is currently having issues with Google. The reports are correct as the site <a href="http://www.ebookers.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.ebookers.co.uk</a> has been dropped from Google search results, with only six âsupplementalâ pages in the search engine. Ebookers dumped from Google [...]
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_4417"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 4417 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_4417"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

